USPTO serial 99754479
THINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAPTER, ALAIN J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian J. Focarino
Brian J. Focarino Cooley LLP1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; Computers and computer hardware; Computer workstations comprising artificial intelligence and machine learning applications; Computer hardware and recorded software systems for artificial intelligence and machine learning applications for AI model orchestration, workload management, thermal orchestration, and multi GPU distributed resource scheduling; Computer hardware with preinstalled software for AI software platform (ILM); Computer hardware with preinstalled software for artificial intelligence and machine learning applications for creating and integrating computer models; Recorded computer software and hardware for artificial intelligence and machine learning applications sold as a unit for artificial intelligence and machine learning applications for concurrent multi-model inference, training, fine-tuning, and quantization | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for AI model orchestration, workload management, thermal orchestration, and multi GPU distributed resource scheduling; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for AI model orchestration, workload management, themral orchestration, and multi GPU distributed resource scheduling; Research in the field of artificial intelligence; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for creating and integrating computer models; Technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence; Providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for machine learning; Design and development of artificial intelligence (AI) software for concurrent multi-model inference, training, fine-tuning, and quantization; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for concurrent multi-model inference, training, fine-tuning, and quantization; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for AI model orchestration, workload management, themral orchestration, and multi GPU distributed resource scheduling; Consultancy in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) technology; Technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |