USPTO serial 99756321
TNS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TNS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marek Krizka
Marek Krizka TRAMA LEGAL, PLLC1178 BROADWAY FL 3New York, NY 10001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Balls for games; Ball pitching machines; Tennis ball throwing apparatus; Tennis nets; Nets for sports; Grip tapes for rackets; Body-building apparatus; Gut for tennis rackets; Tennis rackets; Game apparatus, namely, bases, bats, and balls for playing indoor and outdoor games | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Arranging and conducting of sports events; Conducting fitness classes; Organization of balls; Organization of sports competitions; Personal trainer services; Providing sports facilities; Providing smash rooms for entertainment purposes; Rental of sports equipment, except vehicles; Rental of sports grounds; Rental of tennis courts; Sports commentary services; Organization, arranging and conducting of sports competitions; Physical fitness assessment services for sports training purposes; Providing educational demonstrations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |