USPTO serial 99760468
GOLDEN BELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, SLOAN H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with GOLDEN BELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gumpoldskirchen, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel Karni Schmidt
Joel Karni Schmidt Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.114 West 47th Street, 21st FloorNew York, NY 10036-1525United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded computer game software; Recorded computer gaming software for gambling; Recorded game software; Recorded video game software; all of the foregoing only for casinos, slot machines and gambling. | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Amusement game machines; Arcade game machines; Arcade video game machines; Electronic gaming machines, namely, devices which accept a wager; Gaming machines for gambling; Stand alone video game machines; Video game machines; all of the foregoing only for casinos, slot machines and gambling. | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games; Entertainment services, namely, providing online video games; Entertainment services, namely, providing games of chance via the Internet; Gaming services in the nature of providing online casino games and games of chance; Providing online computer games; Provision of information relating to electronic computer games provided via the Internet; all of the foregoing only for casinos, slot machines and gambling. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |