Drawing for KEY DECISION ARCHITECTURE

USPTO serial 99764161

KEY DECISION ARCHITECTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELCH, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KEY DECISION ARCHITECTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business transformation consulting services in the field of enterprise operating models, business capabilities, and structured decision-making systems; Business consulting, management, and planning services in the field of enterprise transformation strategy, operating model design, and business capability planning; Business consulting services in the field of digital transformation and enterprise design; Business organization consultingACTIVE—
041Business training in the field of business transformation, digital transformation, enterprise operating models, business capability planning, and decision-making frameworks; Arranging and conducting of training workshops in the field of business transformation, enterprise design, and business capability planning; Providing online training in the field of business transformation, enterprise design, and decision-making frameworks; Providing training for certification in the field of business transformation, enterprise operating models, and decision-making frameworksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 14, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance