USPTO serial 99773553
SIUTILITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, ALINA S.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Deadline: December 1, 2026
Need help with SIUTILITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Office Action issues
The examiner has identified that you need to clarify the description of your services to make them more definite. Additionally, the examiner noted that your services may need to be classified across multiple international classes.
Owner
Miami-Dade County, FL, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing an external credibility infrastructure for artificial intelligence systems; providing non-downloadable software for identity verification, authority resolution, and machine-readable credibility signals; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring software for verifying, structuring, and distributing trusted data across AI systems, autonomous agents, and decentralized computing environments; providing online non-downloadable software for use in evaluating, validating, and resolving real-world entities and information for artificial intelligence applications; providing online non-downloadable software infrastructure for enabling artificial intelligence systems to determine verified identity, authority, and trust across multiple platforms and environments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |