USPTO serial 99780103
DINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYER, BENJAMIN A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chula Vista, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Skale
Andrew D. Skale Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.3580 Carmel Mountain RoadSuite 300San Diego, CA 92130Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Sparkling wine; Dry white sparkling wine; Dry rosé sparkling wine; Alcoholic beverages, namely, sparkling wine | ACTIVE | Dec 23, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |