USPTO serial 99780119
OASIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Deadline: 27 Oct 2026
Need help with OASIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Office Action issues
The USPTO examiner requires us to clarify your software descriptions, provide additional informational materials about your offerings, and has temporarily deferred the search for conflicting trademarks.
Owner
Nashville, TN, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq. Gerben Perrott PLLC1050 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 500Washington, DC 20036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software and application programming interface (API) software libraries for context engineering, context mapping, information retrieval, and knowledge orchestration for operational intelligence applications, namely: constructing semantic data layers that map canonical relationships across multiple enterprise data sources; confidence-tiered validation and promotion of data findings through staged quality gates; hybrid information retrieval combining vector search, keyword search, and knowledge graph traversal with domain-aware context routing for artificial intelligence agents; cross-system entity resolution for deterministic identity matching across disparate enterprise vendor systems; automated data quality validation including schema drift detection, structured query verification, and numerical claim certification; knowledge graph construction with AI-generated cross-domain relationship bridges; and sub-agent orchestration for coordinating multiple artificial intelligence agents performing operational intelligence and enterprise data analysis tasks; none of the foregoing being generative artificial intelligence models, large language models, blockchain platforms, or cryptocurrency applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services and platform as a service (PaaS) services, both featuring non-generative artificial intelligence software for context engineering, context mapping, information retrieval, and knowledge orchestration for operational intelligence applications, namely: constructing and maintaining semantic data layers that map canonical relationships across multiple enterprise data sources; confidence-tiered validation and promotion of data findings through staged quality gates; hybrid information retrieval combining vector search, keyword search, and knowledge graph traversal with domain-aware routing to deliver context to artificial intelligence agents; cross-system entity resolution for deterministic identity matching of records across disparate enterprise vendor systems; automated data quality validation including schema drift detection, structured query verification, numerical claim certification, and join-path integrity auditing; knowledge graph construction and maintenance with AI-generated cross-domain relationship bridges; operational data visualization through interactive dashboards fed by the semantic data layer; sub-agent orchestration for coordinating multiple artificial intelligence agents performing operational intelligence and enterprise data analysis tasks with adversarial review; and compression-defensive agent memory management for externalizing session state under context-window constraints; none of the foregoing being generative artificial intelligence models, large language models, blockchain platforms, or cryptocurrency applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |