USPTO serial 99780726
MORITZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RYAN, KELLY MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MORITZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint Petersburg, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marek Krizka
Marek Krizka TRAMA LEGAL, PLLC1178 BROADWAY FL 3New York, NY 10001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for generating, reviewing, analyzing, and managing legal documents, conducting legal research, and providing legal information and workflow automation in the field of law; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for generating, reviewing, analyzing, and managing legal documents, conducting legal research, and providing legal information and workflow automation in the field of law; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for generating, reviewing, analyzing, and managing legal documents, conducting legal research, and providing legal information and workflow automation in the field of law | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Legal services; Legal information services; Legal consultancy; Legal advisory services; Providing an on-line interactive database featuring legal information; Legal document preparation; Legal research | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |