USPTO serial 99781433
INFINITE LASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BATT, JAIME L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFINITE LASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marina del Rey, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY B. PERLEBERG
GREGORY B. PERLEBERG PIERSON FERDINAND LLP578 Washington BlvdSuite 712Marina del Rey, CA 90292Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated eyelash and eyebrow serums; cosmetic preparations for enhancing the appearance of eyelashes and eyebrows; peptide-based cosmetic serums for conditioning and strengthening lashes and brows; non-medicated cosmetic preparations featuring peptides, hyaluronic acid, and conditioning agents for improving lash and brow appearance; cosmetic lash and brow treatments for volumizing, lengthening, and revitalizing eyelashes and eyebrows; ; all of the foregoing excluding false eyelashes and adhesives for affixing false eyelashes | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |