USPTO serial 99781876
AMZCHEF PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with AMZCHEF PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FLUSHING, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas Scott Berman
Douglas Scott Berman ZYL LAW FIRM LLC101 Nicoll StreetNew Haven, CT 06511United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Fruit presses, electric, for household purposes; Electric juicers; Electric kitchen mixers; Electric food blenders; Electric milk frothers; Electric food choppers; Meat choppers, electric; Electric meat grinders; Electric noodle making machines; Electric vacuum food sealers for household purposes; Electric coffee grinders; Electric egg beaters; Dishwashers; Crushers for kitchen use, electric; Electric ice crushers; Sausage making machines; Garbage disposal machines; Beverage preparation machines, electromechanical; Vacuum cleaners; Washing machines for household purposes | ACTIVE | Apr 17, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |