USPTO serial 99788668
FLOW W3
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLOW W3?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael T. Smith
Michael T. Smith Birch Stewart Kolasch & Birch, LLP2600 Park Tower Drive, Suite 600Vienna, VA 22180United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Wet and dry vacuum cleaners; Vacuum cleaners powered by rechargeable batteries; Steam cleaners for household purposes; Household cleaning robots for helping with daily chores for household purposes; Electric vacuum cleaners; Dust filters and bags for vacuum cleaners; Hoses for vacuum cleaners; Electric washing machines for household purposes; Robotic vacuum cleaners; Nozzles for vacuum cleaners; Steam cleaning machines in the nature of steam mops | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Mains chargers in the nature of battery chargers; Chargers for electric vacuum cleaners; Battery charge devices; Downloadable computer application software for managing settings and controlling the operation of vacuum cleaners; Batteries for electric vacuum cleaners; Battery charging stands for vacuum cleaners; Wireless chargers for vacuum cleaners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |