Drawing for RESOLV INSITE

USPTO serial 99789375

RESOLV INSITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUNDAR, SHERYL CHRISTINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 136

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESOLV INSITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen K. Won

Karen K. Won MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.COne Financial CenterBoston, MA 02111United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Handheld multifunction electronic devices for scanning and assessing contents within solid surfaces of built structures; Handheld multifunction electronic devices and embedded software providing real-time images and videos of studs, pipes, wires, ducts, insulation, and other structural details within solid surfaces of built structures; Handheld multifunction electronic devices and embedded software for use in connection with detecting and imaging defects, damages, and pests within solid surfaces of built structures; Downloadable companion software for handheld multifunction electronic devices, used for analyzing, storing, filtering, processing, editing, and sharing acquired images and videos and related data; Downloadable companion software for handheld multifunction electronic devices, used for 3D modeling, 3D data analysis, and 3D and augmented reality visualization of acquired images and videosACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable companion software for handheld multifunction electronic devices for processing data from scanned images; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for providing information, real-time reality images and videos, and augmented reality images and videos regarding studs, pipes, wires, ducts, insulation, and other structural detail behind or within solid surfaces of built structures; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for detecting and imaging defects, damages, and pests behind or within solid surfaces of built structures; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for analyzing, storing, filtering, processing, editing, and sharing information, real-time reality images and videos, and augmented reality images and videos, and related data regarding contents behind or within solid surfaces of built structures; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for 3D modeling, 3D data analysis, and 3D and augmented reality visualization of contents behind or within solid surfaces of built structuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 27, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance