USPTO serial 99791172
LEDGIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, CATHERINE ANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEDGIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Washington, DC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas T. Santucci
3137 E Elwood ST STE 130, DPT#EXAZ1394Phoenix, AZ 85034United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for managing digital wallets and processing global financial transactions; Downloadable computer software for use as a system of record to reconcile and audit financial transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Banking services; Electronic funds transfer; Issuing of credit cards; Processing of electronic wallet payments; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing financial transactions and reconciling financial records; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for embedded banking, namely, for integrating secured credit card issuance, consumer credit line management, and cardholder account administration into web and mobile applications and for issuing global credit and debit cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |