Drawing for RATHER

USPTO serial 99791753

RATHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RATHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JORGE ARCINIEGA

JORGE ARCINIEGA LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd.Suite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032powders for making non-alcoholic soft drinks; powders for making non-alcoholic carbonated soft drinks; fruit juices; vegetable juices; isotonic beverages; protein-enriched sports beverages for athletes; preparations for making soft drinks; preparations for making non-alcoholic mixed fruit-vegetable juice beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 15, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 7, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 28, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance