USPTO serial 99793718
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Muhammad Asfandyar
237 S Elm DrBeverly Hills, CA 90212United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | (Based on 44(e))(Based on 44(d) Priority Application)(Based on Intent to Use) Electric vehicles, namely, passenger cars, trucks, and motorcycles; Autonomous land vehicles; Autonomous air vehicles; Self-driving transport vehicles; Land vehicles; Air vehicles for transport; Air vehicles in the nature of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); Autonomous cars; Self-driving trucks; Self-driving cars; Autonomous delivery robots; Autonomous robots for delivery; Hybrid cars; Hydrogen fueled cars; Delivery drones; Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); Electric motors for motor cars; Electric motor cycles; Electrically-powered motor scooters; Electrically powered motor vehicles; Electric cars; Motorcycles; Electric motorcycles (Based on 44(d) Priority Application)(Based on Intent to Use) Motors, electric, for land vehicles; Structural parts for motorcycles; Structural parts for automobiles; Structural parts for drones; Structural parts for aircraft; Structural parts for electric cars | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |