USPTO serial 99796582
TWIN/LOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMA, GABRIELLE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with TWIN/LOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint-Georges-d'Espéranche, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ee Ming T. Bahk
P.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | (Based on 44(e))(Based on Intent to Use) Belt conveyors; pallet conveyors (Based on 44(d) Priority Application)(Based on Intent to Use) conveyors being machines; belts for conveyors; timing belts for machines; drive belts for machines; machine coupling and transmission components, except for land vehicles; belts for machines; tracks being part of conveyors; wire mesh conveyor belts; assembly line conveyor machinery; roller conveyors; cargo handling machines; cargo handling robots; conveyor belt accessories, namely, linking devices for conveyor belts; conveyor belt accessories, namely, fasteners for conveyor belts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |