USPTO serial 99797302
RAPID FFN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with RAPID FFN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marlborough, MA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles F. Reidelbach, Jr.
Charles F. Reidelbach, Jr. Higgs Fletcher & Mack LLP401 West A Street, Suite 2600San Diego, CA 92101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic publications, namely instrument manuals and guides for operating diagnostic instruments recorded on computer media; downloadable software for operating diagnostic instruments; diagnostic instrument, and parts thereof, for scientific or research use, and downloadable operating software for diagnostic instrument use therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Diagnostic instrument, and parts thereof, for clinical or medical use, namely, automated in vitro diagnostic specimen analyzer instrument for the detection of analytes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |