USPTO serial 99797780
MERRITT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with MERRITT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick D. Duplessis
Patrick D. Duplessis Verrill Dana, LLP355 Riverside Ave.Westport, CT 06880United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Joysticks being parts of machines, other than for game machines, and component parts therefor; electronic control systems being parts of machines and component parts therefor; grips and handles specially adapted for joysticks and electronic control systems being parts of machines and component parts therefor; enclosures for housing joysticks and electronic control devices, being parts of machines; operator chair systems composed of a chair and electronic control systems for machines, being parts of off highway or industrial machinery and equipment, and component parts therefor; operator chair systems composed of a chair and electronic control systems for machines, specially adapted for off highway or industrial machinery and equipment, and component parts therefor; foot-operated control pedals being parts of machines; rotary switches being parts of machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Joysticks for use with electronic control systems for machines and component parts therefor; electronic control apparatus, namely, electronic controllers and output devices for off highway or industrial machinery and equipment, and component parts therefor; electric switches, and component parts therefor; electronic interface modules for off highway or industrial machinery and equipment, and component parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2026 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |