USPTO serial 99799074
ENVIROFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOBO, DEBORAH E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Deadline: 5 Dec 2026
Need help with ENVIROFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Office Action issues
The examiner has identified a likelihood of confusion with an existing registration and requires you to clarify your entity details, goods descriptions, class classifications, and foreign registration.
Owner
Concord, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Nagle, Jr.
David W. Nagle, Jr. Stites & Harbison, PLLC400 West Market St.Suite 1800Louisville, KY 40202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | acoustical insulation; sound control flooring underlayment; sound-absorbing ceiling coverings; sound-absorbing wall coverings; sound-dampening ceiling coverings; sound-dampening wall coverings; soundproofing ceiling coverings; acoustical insulation barrier sheets made of sound-absorbing vinyl and rubber materials; soundproofing materials made of vinyl and rubber; soundproofing vinyl and rubber sheets; sound-absorbing floor coverings; sound-dampening floor coverings; soundproofing wall coverings; soundproofing flooring coverings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |