USPTO serial 99802754
S SITELINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with S SITELINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Holly Pranger
Holly Pranger Pranger Law PC88 Guy Place, Suite 405San Francisco, CA 94105United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | (Based on Use) Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in managing and monitoring workstream, documents, compliance, financing, and payments for construction projects; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for managing lien rights and waivers; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for managing vendors; (Based on Intent to Use) Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for construction management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for tracking work progress, material handling, and work and material approvals in the field of construction and construction management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for preparing invoices over computer networks, intranets and the internet; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for business invoicing; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for sending, routing and digitally signing electronic documents and distributing, registering, viewing, tracking, filing, sharing and storing executed electronic documents and related data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for generating, submitting, and managing payment applications; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for accounts receivable reporting; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for billing and cash flow forecasting; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for monitoring compliance requirements in the field of construction; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for application and database integration | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |