USPTO serial 99805027
ZIGGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIGGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIFER HUGHES
JENNIFER HUGHES525 S Hewitt StreetLos Angeles, CA 90013United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring, managing, optimizing, scheduling, reserving, dispatching, routing, controlling, and coordinating electric vehicle charging systems, battery systems, mobile energy infrastructure, and mobile and robotic electric vehicle charging services; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing usage, demand, telemetry, availability, energy delivery, state-of-charge, performance, safety, sustainability, and operational data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for generating reports, forecasts, and recommendations; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for integrating charging systems and services with third-party platforms, APIs, parking, property, payment, CRM, infotainment, virtual assistant, and customer-facing applications; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling voice recognition, voice-activated control, virtual assistant functionality, mapping, navigation, digital content, advertising, AI and machine learning optimization, predictive maintenance, automated deployment, cybersecurity, data security, system monitoring, and electrician network management. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |