Drawing for SORCERO EVIDENCE

USPTO serial 99812296

SORCERO EVIDENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NGUYEN, ANGELA G
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SORCERO EVIDENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine P. Califa

Katherine P. Califa Foley & Lardner LLP3000 K Street, N.W.Sixth FloorWashington, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing, editing, and improving academic, scientific and medical documents and citations using artificial intelligence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for facilitating systematic literature review; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for reading, annotating, summarizing, and extracting information from academic research papers, scientific literature, and medical literatureACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 11, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 8, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 8, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance