USPTO serial 99816390
FINCENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FINCENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN JOSE, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD LEE MORRIS JR ESQ
RICHARD LEE MORRIS JR ESQ 1-800-4-TRADEMARK PAP.O. Box 398538c/o TrademarkRenewals.comMiami Beach, FL 33239Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer chips; Computer memory modules; Computer hardware, namely, energy efficient computer chips, energy efficient computer memory modules, computer chips, and energy efficient computer systems comprised primarily of computer hardware and embedded neural network system software, downloadable computer operating system software, and systems on a chip (SOC); Computer hardware, namely, computer chips and memory modules for use in regulatory compliance and automated reporting, enterprise risk assessment and mitigation, portfolio and asset management, fraud prevention and anomaly detection, and predictive modeling of customer behavior using artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of computer chips; Technology advisory services related to computer chips, energy efficient computer memory modules, computer chips, energy efficient computer systems, computer operating systems, downloadable software, and systems on a chip (SOC); Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; Providing technology information in the field of computer chips, computer memory modules, computer operating systems, downloadable software, and systems on a chip (SOC) for use in regulatory compliance and automated reporting, enterprise risk assessment and mitigation, portfolio and asset management, fraud prevention and anomaly detection, predictive modeling of business markets, and customer behavior using artificial intelligence. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |