USPTO serial 99817504
HARK ROBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BICE, DANIEL TRAVIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with HARK ROBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Jose, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexis N. Degler
Alexis N. Degler Barnes & Thornburg1 N. Wacker DriveSuite 4400Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Smart speakers; audio devices including microphones for ambient voice capture; smart home hubs; voice-controlled electronic devices; microphones; electronic audio apparatus; digital audio players; portable media players; wireless speakers; smart displays with integrated voice control; humanoid robots; robots for processing voice queries and generating audio responses; wireless controllers for smart devices and audio equipment; wireless controllers for audio input and output devices; wearable computers and electronic devices in the nature of smartwatches, smart rings, smart eyewear, and smart jewelry; wireless receivers; wearable activity trackers; wearable digital electronic devices for voice communication; earbuds; hearing aids; headphones; voice-enabled personal assistant in the nature of smartwatches, smart rings, smart eyewear, and smart jewelry; electronic jewelry incorporating audio technology, microphones, speakers, and wireless communication capabilities for data collection and transmission | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 9, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |