USPTO serial 99818493
ETWIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ETWIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Theo
James M. Theo Dinsmore & Shohl LLP222 West Adams StreetSuite 3400Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded computer software for analyzing and forecasting business performance data and generating optimization recommendations across multiple business domains; downloadable computer software featuring artificial intelligence for aggregating, visualizing, and managing organizational performance data, namely, data reflecting a company's operations, assets, and workflows; downloadable computer software for integrating, orchestrating, and executing workflows across disparate enterprise systems, namely, software used for enterprise resource planning (ERP), customer relationship management (CRM), and human capital management (HCM), and data platforms; downloadable computer software for real-time monitoring of business performance data and automated forecasting and decision recommendations; downloadable computer software for aggregating and analyzing organization-wide operational data to identify efficiency improvements across business functions. | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business process management services, namely, providing business consulting services for optimizing operational performance across multiple business domains; business data analysis services performed using artificial intelligence-based software, for identifying operational efficiencies; providing business consulting services in the field of resource allocation and operational throughput management; business analytics services, namely, analysis of business performance data to support operational decision-making. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) featuring artificial intelligence-based software for analyzing business performance data and generating operational optimization recommendations; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for aggregating, visualizing, and managing organizational performance data; hosting of computer software platforms for real-time monitoring of business performance data, forecasting, and automated decision recommendations; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for integrating data between enterprise resource planning (ERP), customer relationship management (CRM), and human capital management (HCM) systems, and coordinating cross-departmental business decisions; computer systems integration services relating to software platforms used for organizational performance monitoring and management; design, deployment, and maintenance of business performance monitoring and management software platforms. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |