USPTO serial 99819142
KYNOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMPONSAH, OHENEBA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KYNOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sheridan, WY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MATTHEW MILLER
MATTHEW MILLER LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW MILLER755 Fresca CourtSolana Beach, CA 92075United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services; Business development services; Business consulting services in the field of artificial intelligence automation and implementation; Business consulting services regarding the business implementation and use of multi-agent artificial intelligence systems; Business consulting services in the field of artificial intelligence workforce automation for business purposes, namely, marketing, business operations, sales, customer support, and business finance; Business consulting services in the field of business process automation and implementation; Business consulting services regarding the business implementation and use of artificial intelligence agent platforms; Providing business information in the field of artificial intelligence agent platforms and artificial intelligence-driven business automation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |