USPTO serial 99826374
PALMATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRASS,KRISTINA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PALMATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V. Barney
601 W Riverside Ave. Suite 1400Spokane, WA 99201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software plug-ins for managing websites that utilizes artificial intelligence to autonomously, research, analyze and optimize websites for general understanding, [1.1]Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Answer Engine Optimization (AEO), Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), Voice Search Optimization (VoSO) and creates targeted written, video and audio content focused on considerations such as an entity's needs, objectives, keywords, services, products, market segments, competitive landscapes, languages and geolocations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for research, analysis and recommendations in order to provide answer engine optimization; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for research, analysis and recommendations in order to provide answer engine optimization; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for research, analysis and recommendations in order to provide answer engine optimization | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |