USPTO serial 99835381
INTAKE ACADEMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WU, KRISTEN ZAHNOW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTAKE ACADEMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew D. Asbell
Matthew D. Asbell LIPPES MATHIAS LLP420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 2005New York, NY 10170United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence for analyzing data and interacting with humans; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing live and recorded communications between paralegals, lawyers, law firms, and legal call centers and their prospective and actual clients; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing live and recorded communications between paralegals, lawyers, law firms, and legal call centers and their prospective and actual clients; Consultancy in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) technology; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring artificial intelligence (AI) software for generating business analysis reports; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for business analytics; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for data assessment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |