Drawing for CONVERGENT

USPTO serial 99835858

CONVERGENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 802
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ONUOHA, ALEXANDRIA N
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONVERGENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perry J. Viscounty

Perry J. Viscounty Latham & Watkins LLP650 Town Center Drive, Suite 2000Costa Mesa, CA 92626United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software development kits (SDKs) and design libraries being downloadable electronic data files for use in integrating artificial intelligence agent monitoring, evaluation, and optimization functionality into existing software applications; downloadable software for capturing, analyzing, and grading production traces of AI agents and large language model applications; downloadable software for generating synthetic evaluation tasks and datasets for AI agents based on production behavior; downloadable software for fine-tuning, post-training, and dataset generation for large language models and AI agentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 20, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 20, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance