USPTO serial 99846761
RDM INTERNATIONAL FRUIT AND VEGETABLES TO THE WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERITZ, SARAH L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with RDM INTERNATIONAL FRUIT AND VEGETABLES TO THE WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Hollywood, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Russell
John E. Russell Allmark Trademark101 Parkshore DriveSuite 100Folsom, CA 95630Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale distributorship services in the field of fresh produce, fresh fruits and vegetables; processed vegetables and fruits, vegetable powders and flours, frozen fruits and frozen vegetables, frozen potato products, including, French fries, waffle fries,, tater tots, and sweet potato fries, dried fruits and vegetables, fruit and vegetable juice concentrates, fruit and vegetable purees, canned vegetables and aseptic fruit purees | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |