Drawing for ARDENT MILLS

USPTO serial 99846910

ARDENT MILLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARDENT MILLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine C. Miller

Catherine C. Miller HOLLAND & HART LLPAttn: Trademark DocketingP.O. Box 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Unprocessed grains, namely, wheat, barley, rye, sorghum, millet, amaranth, and teff; raw pulsesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 26, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 26, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance