Drawing for THE SPINE

USPTO serial 99863331

THE SPINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 641Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIRCHGASSER, ROSS LEONARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 641: Status 641 means the USPTO mailed a non-final Office Action identifying issues with your application. You typically have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Need help with THE SPINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jessica G. McDonald

Jessica G. McDonald Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner P.A.PO Box 2938Minneapolis, MN 55402United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for controlling the initiation and execution of software processes and workflows based on predefined rules, conditions, and permissions that must be satisfied before any process may run; Downloadable software for evaluating operational conditions within software systems against fixed, predefined criteria to produce consistent and repeatable outcomes; Downloadable software for collecting, organizing, and processing records that document and substantiate system activity; Downloadable software for applying surrounding operational context to determine how software processes should respond to incoming instructions and conditions; Downloadable software for confirming that software process conditions meet required standards and for restricting the execution of system actions to authorized users and systems; Downloadable software for logging software process steps, decisions, and outputs in a format that enables step-by-step review and reproduction after the fact; and; Downloadable software for managing multi-step software processes that require sequential approvals and authorizations from designated authorities before each step may proceedACTIVE—
042Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for controlling the initiation and execution of software processes and workflows based on predefined rules, conditions, and permissions that must be satisfied before any process may run; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for evaluating operational conditions within software systems against fixed, predefined criteria to produce consistent and repeatable outcomes; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for collecting, organizing, and processing records that document and substantiate system activity; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for applying surrounding operational context to determine how software processes should respond to incoming instructions and conditions; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for confirming that software process conditions meet required standards and for restricting the execution of system actions to authorized users and systems; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for logging software process steps, decisions, and outputs in a format that enables step-by-step review and reproduction after the fact; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for managing multi-step software processes that require sequential approvals and authorizations from designated authorities before each step may proceed; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for controlling the initiation and execution of software processes and workflows based on predefined rules, conditions, and permissions that must be satisfied before any process may run; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for evaluating operational conditions within software systems against fixed, predefined criteria to produce consistent and repeatable outcomes; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for collecting, organizing, and processing records that document and substantiate system activity; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for applying surrounding operational context to determine how software processes should respond to incoming instructions and conditions; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for confirming that software process conditions meet required standards and for restricting the execution of system actions to authorized users and systems; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for logging software process steps, decisions, and outputs in a format that enables step-by-step review and reproduction after the fact; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing multi-step software processes that require sequential approvals and authorizations from designated authorities before each step may proceed; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for controlling the initiation and execution of software processes and workflows based on predefined rules, conditions, and permissions that must be satisfied before any process may run; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for evaluating operational conditions within software systems against fixed, predefined criteria to produce consistent and repeatable outcomes; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for collecting, organizing, and processing records that document and substantiate system activity; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for applying surrounding operational context to determine how software processes should respond to incoming instructions and conditions; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for confirming that software process conditions meet required standards and for restricting the execution of system actions to authorized users and systems; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for logging software process steps, decisions, and outputs in a format that enables step-by-step review and reproduction after the fact; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for managing multi-step software processes that require sequential approvals and authorizations from designated authorities before each step may proceedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (GNRN): A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 3, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance