USPTO serial 99864849
SHED GEEK MARKETING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAVIS, MARC STEPHEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHED GEEK MARKETING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Metropolis, IL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin Clark
Justin Clark J. Clark Law Firm, PLLC3100 West Ray Road, Suite 201Chandler, AZ 85226United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Direct marketing services; Digital marketing services; Advertising and marketing consultancy; Development of marketing strategies, concepts and tactics, namely, audience development, brand awareness, customer relations, online community building and digital word of mouth communications; Development of marketing strategies and concepts; Providing marketing consulting in the field of social media; Customer relationship management; Creative marketing plan development services; Creating advertising material; Consulting services in the field of search engine optimization for sales promotion; Search engine optimization for sales promotion; Search engine optimization for promoting the websites of others; Consultation services, namely, creative and strategic consultation regarding development and production of marketing campaigns for others; Providing advertising, marketing and promotional services, namely, development of advertising campaigns for businesses in the shed and portable building industry | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2023 |
| 042 | Designing and creating web sites for others; Planning, design, development and maintenance of online websites for third parties; Website design consultancy; Computer services, namely, creating, maintaining, designing and implementing web sites for others; Technological consultancy services in the field of search engine optimization | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |