USPTO serial 99865123
RESOLUT AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEICHTER, KENNETH HOWARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 134
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with RESOLUT AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carson City, NV, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffery M. Lillywhite
Jeffery M. Lillywhite Kimball Anderson310 S Main StreetSuite 102Salt Lake City, UT 84101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software using large language models (LLMs) for language translation; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for language translation; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in live teleconferencing, artificial intelligence applications, language translation, and educational training; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in live teleconferencing, artificial intelligence applications, language translation, and educational training; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for live teleconferencing, artificial intelligence applications, language translation, and educational training; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for live teleconferencing, artificial intelligence applications, language translation, and educational training | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |