USPTO serial 99867983
CODEVINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CODEVINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erica L. Tritt
Erica L. Tritt The Sladkus Law Group1397 Carroll DriveAtlanta, GA 30318United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for capturing, analyzing, organizing, and correlating the workflow data of software developers and software engineers, and employing agentic artificial intelligence (AI) to compound and scale skills and AI-driven development at an organizational level; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for capturing, analyzing, organizing, and correlating the workflow data of software developers and software engineers, and employing agentic artificial intelligence (AI) to compound and scale skills and AI-driven development at an organizational level; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for capturing, analyzing, organizing, and correlating the workflow data of software developers and software engineers, and employing agentic artificial intelligence (AI) to compound and scale skills and AI-driven development at an organizational level; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for capturing, analyzing, organizing, and correlating the workflow data of software developers and software engineers, and employing agentic artificial intelligence (AI) to compound and scale skills and AI-driven development at an organizational level; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for capturing, analyzing, organizing, and correlating the workflow data of software developers and software engineers, and employing agentic artificial intelligence (AI) to compound and scale skills and AI-driven development at an organizational level; Consulting services for others in the field of design, planning, and implementation project management of software development workflow tools at an organizational level | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |