USPTO serial 99868502
AVA-MRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AVA-MRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach
Connie L. Ellerbach Fenwick & West LLP801 California St.Mountain View, CA 94041United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware for data storage using magnetoresistive random access memory (MRAM) technology; Semi-conductor memories; Semi-conductor memory units; Electronic memories; Computer memory devices; Memory boards; Memory expansion modules; Memory cards being computer hardware; Memories for use with computers; Memories for data processing equipment; RAM (random access memory) card; Disc memories; Semiconductors; Semiconductor integrated circuits; Semiconductor wafers; Structured semi-conductor wafers; Integrated circuits; Integrated circuit modules; Electronic integrated circuits; Large scale integrated circuits; Very large scale integration (VLSI) semiconductor integrated circuits; Microchips being computer hardware; Microcircuits; System on a Chip (SoC); Magnetic cores; Computer hardware for high-speed processing and storage of data using multiple CPUs; Solid state drives; Computer storage devices, namely, high-speed storage subsystems for storage and backup of electronic data either locally or via a telecommunications network; Computer hardware for aggregating and recording sensor data from aircraft systems in a centralized secure location; Computer hardware for high-speed processing of artificial intelligence (AI) data structures and high-capacity hybrid data storage in space environments; Computer hardware for high-speed storage and management of electronic data in data centers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |