USPTO serial 99868608
MAGNIT GATEWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGER, MELANIE ALYSSA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAGNIT GATEWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Folsom, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mathew J. Temmerman
Mathew J. Temmerman Temmerman Law50 California Street, Suite 1500San Francisco, CA 94111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing online business information databases featuring contingent workforce, vendor, supplier, job requisition, candidate submission, timesheet, invoice, workforce demand, market-rate, bill-rate, supplier performance, candidate performance, staffing performance, fill-rate, win-rate, time-to-fill, and workforce program performance data; providing business information, business analytics, benchmarking, statistical analysis, and business reports in the fields of supplier management, vendor management, staffing, contingent workforce management, job requisitions, candidate submissions, supplier performance, candidate performance, workforce demand, rates, and workforce program performance; business consulting services relating to staffing supplier enablement, supplier benchmarking, rate competitiveness, candidate pipelines, and contingent workforce program performance | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for supplier management, vendor management, contingent workforce management, staffing supplier enablement, managed service provider program administration, and workforce management platform integration; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable application programming interface (API) software for integrating applicant tracking, customer relationship management, vendor management, workforce management, timekeeping, and invoicing systems; providing online non-downloadable software for secure system-to-system data exchange, job requisition retrieval, candidate submission automation, submission tracking, timesheet and invoice data exchange, supplier analytics, benchmarking, workforce demand and rate analysis, candidate and supplier performance analysis, fill-rate analysis, win-rate analysis, and time-to-fill analysis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |