USPTO serial 99870429
CAPITAL MEAT IMPORTS TASTE THE DIFFERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUTTON, CATHERINE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAPITAL MEAT IMPORTS TASTE THE DIFFERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Niv Vladimir Davidovich
Niv Vladimir Davidovich DAVIDOVICH STONE LAW GROUP, LLP6442 Coldwater Canyon Ave Ste 209North Hollywood, CA 91606United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; Steaks of meat; Packaged meats; All natural meats; Meat, poultry and game | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2025 |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorships featuring meat | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2025 |
| 039 | Import and export services, namely, transportation of the merchandise of others in the nature of meat | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |