USPTO serial 99871393
PROSIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with PROSIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claudia W. Stangle
Claudia W. Stangle Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.180 N. Stetson Ave.Suite 4900Chicago, IL 60601-6745Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical apparatus and instruments; optical waveguides for guiding light waves, namely, transparent waveguides including total internal reflection (TIR) waveguides, transparent holographic waveguides, and transparent holographic waveguides made of glass, a glass-polymer sandwich or a polymer-polymer sandwich, said waveguides comprising at least one holographic optical element; smart device displays featuring a transparent waveguide, namely, smart glasses displays, head-up displays for automobile drivers and aircraft pilots, head-mounted displays; data glass devices, namely, smart glasses featuring a transparent holographic waveguide and a light-sensitive sensor, a light source and/or an imaging device; holographic optical elements in the nature of optical devices, namely, optical lenses; reflective holographic optical elements in the nature of optical devices, namely, optical lenses; transmissive holographic optical elements in the nature of optical devices; Displays; head-up-displays; holograms; optical structures for directing, utilizing, projecting light; optical structures for directing wavelengths of light; optical grating structures; Holographic films; Photosensitive films [exposed] | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Land vehicle parts, namely, vehicle windows, especially windshields featuring a transparent holographic waveguide; Air and space vehicle parts, namely, transparent information and entertainment displays in the cabin; Air and space vehicle parts, namely, transparent information and entertainment displays and head-up displays featuring a transparent holographic waveguide in the cockpit | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Window glass for building featuring a transparent holographic waveguide; window glass for building comprising a transparent holographic waveguide and a light-sensitive sensor, a light source and/or an imaging device; smart glass for building comprising a transparent holographic waveguide and a light-sensitive sensor, a light source and/or an imaging device | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |