Drawing for EXTREME FIRE

USPTO serial 99871463

EXTREME FIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COFFEY, AARON
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXTREME FIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paulo A. de Almeida

Paulo A. de Almeida Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP11400 W. Olympic Blvd. 9th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90064United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable virtual reality game software; Video disks and video tapes with recorded animated cartoons; Recorded computer game programs; Recorded computer game software; Downloadable computer game programmes; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, portable media players, handheld computers, namely, software for use in playing computer games; Downloadable computer game software; Recorded computer virtual reality game software; Downloadable game software for use on smartphones; none of the foregoing being gambling games, or used for, or relating to gaming machines, slot machines, video lottery terminals, bingo machines, casino equipment, or lottery equipmentACTIVE—
041Organization of electronic game competitions; Film production, other than advertising films; Entertainment services, namely, providing online video games; Providing information in the field of entertainment; Providing a computer game for use network-wide by network users; Virtual reality game services provided on-line from a computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games; Multimedia publishing relating to computer game software; Providing online computer games; none of the foregoing being gambling games, or used for, or relating to gaming machines, slot machines, video lottery terminals, bingo machines, casino equipment, or lottery equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 8, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance