USPTO serial 99874875
BOTAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVOIE, RYAN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with BOTAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Arcadia, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clement Cheng
4522 Katella Avenue Ste. 200Los Alamitos, CA 90720United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Slippers | ACTIVE | May 1, 2018 |
| 030 | Hamburger sandwiches; Cooked rice mixed with vegetables and beef (bibimbap); Corn-based snack foods; Flavourings for foods; Grain-based snack foods; Multigrain-based snack foods; Pre-packaged lunches consisting primarily of rice, and also including meat, fish or vegetables; Processed seeds used as a flavoring for foods and beverages; Rice-based snack foods; Sandwiches, namely, hamburgers; Seasoned coating mixtures for foods; Wheat-based snack foods | ACTIVE | May 1, 2018 |
| 035 | Retail vending machine services featuring food | ACTIVE | May 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |