USPTO serial 99884765
AI CHIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
Status 680 means the examining attorney approved your mark for publication in the USPTO Official Gazette. Publication for opposition usually follows within weeks, opening a 30-day window for third parties to oppose. Watch for publication (status 686) and monitor the 30-day opposition window.
Need help with AI CHIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Palm Beach Gardens, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hilary F Steinberger
Hilary F Steinberger STEINBERGER IP LAW101 Brevard AvenueCocoa, FL 32922United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Potato chips; Banana chips; Cassava chips; Kale chips; Plantain chips; Apple chips; Fruit chips; Vegetable chips; Low-fat potato chips; Seasoned potato chips; Kettle-cooked potato chips; Potato crisps and chips; Sweet potato-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tortilla chips; Flour-based chips; Corn-based chips; Pretzel chips; Pita chips; Taco chips; Corn chips; Bagel chips; Rice chips; Grain-based chips; Chocolate-covered potato chips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |