USPTO serial 99885310
RAILGARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAJCHER HARTNETT, MEGAN K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with RAILGARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, VI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason R. Wachter
Jason R. Wachter Gottlieb, Rackman & Reisman P.C.270 Madison Avenue, Suite 1403New York, NY 10016United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Roadway barriers, not of metal; traffic barriers, not of metal; crash barriers, not of metal; highway safety barriers, not of metal; non-metal vehicle restraint barriers; non-metal vehicle arresting barriers; vehicle arresting systems comprised primarily of non-metal barriers, restraint nets, and energy absorbers; truck arresting systems; vehicle containment barriers; railway crossing safety barriers; roadway closure barriers; median barriers; portable traffic control barriers, not of metal; roadway safety and traffic control products, namely, components parts made of plastic for roadway barriers, vehicle crash attenuators and vehicle impact cushions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |