USPTO serial 99891633
LACONIQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREIRA FILHO, JOAO BOSCO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 136
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LACONIQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Powell, OH, IN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for routing user prompts and application requests among large language models and other artificial intelligence models, namely, multimodal, image, speech, embedding and classification models, by selecting the model to which each request is sent based on cost, performance and policy rules; downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for monitoring the usage, latency, errors and cost of artificial intelligence applications; downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for governance of artificial intelligence applications, namely, enforcing access controls, usage limits and approval rules, and recording audit logs for requests to artificial intelligence models; downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for reducing token usage and operating costs of artificial intelligence applications; none of the foregoing being business, financial, environmental, social, public-policy, governance or infrastructure consulting or engineering services. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software using artificial intelligence (AI) for routing user prompts and application requests among large language models and other artificial intelligence models, namely, multimodal, image, speech, embedding and classification models, by selecting the model to which each request is sent based on cost, performance and policy rules; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software using artificial intelligence (AI) for monitoring the usage, latency, errors and cost of artificial intelligence applications; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software using artificial intelligence (AI) for governance of artificial intelligence applications, namely, enforcing access controls, usage limits and approval rules, and recording audit logs for requests to artificial intelligence models; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software using artificial intelligence (AI) for reducing token usage and operating costs of artificial intelligence applications; none of the foregoing being business, financial, environmental, social, public-policy, governance or infrastructure consulting or engineering services. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |