USPTO serial 99894981
EATON TRANSACTIONAL SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 680 means the examining attorney approved your mark for publication in the USPTO Official Gazette. Publication for opposition usually follows within weeks, opening a 30-day window for third parties to oppose. Watch for publication (status 686) and monitor the 30-day opposition window.
Need help with EATON TRANSACTIONAL SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cleveland, OH, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Una L Lauricia
Una L Lauricia Eaton Corporation1000 Eaton BoulevardCleveland, OH 44122United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consultancy services; Business consultation services; Business management consulting services in the field of business management methodologies; Business organization and operation consultancy; Consultancy services regarding business strategies; Business consulting services in the field of operating systems, process optimization, organizational design, transactional process re-engineering, application of artificial intelligence agents in enterprise back office functions; Business management advice; Provision of business information via global computer networks; Providing business advice and information in the field of enterprise operating system design and implementation | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Business training; Educational services, namely, developing, arranging, and conducting educational conferences and programs and providing courses of instruction in the field of business management methodologies, enterprise operating systems, transactional process design, artificial intelligence integration into business functions; Providing online non-downloadable publications in the nature of training materials in the field of business management methodologies, enterprise operating systems, transactional process design, artificial intelligence integration into business functions; Providing training for certification in the field of business management methodologies; Educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops, and certification training classes in the fields of business management methodologies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |