USPTO serial 99898422
EDGO TRANSIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BARREDA, AMBER KYLEE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDGO TRANSIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Litchfield, CT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RUSSELL FREDERICK ANDERSON
RUSSELL FREDERICK ANDERSON PULLMAN & COMLEY, LLC850 Main StreetBridgeport, CT 06601United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for transportation management and fleet management in the field of education, namely, software for tracking and managing student transportation in the nature of student pick-up and drop-off; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for customer relationship management for school transportation providers; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for planning, analyzing, and optimizing transportation routes, runs, and bus stops; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for route and process analytics, namely, analyzing transportation route data and operational process data; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for financial management and billing analytics, namely, tracking, analyzing, and reporting transportation costs and billing data; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for labor management, namely, tracking driver and staff hours and assignments; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for tracking fuel and energy consumption; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for tracking vehicle mileage; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing specialized transportation equipment; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for staffing management, namely, scheduling and assigning drivers and transportation staff; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for vehicle location tracking and monitoring; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing and tracking vehicle incidents and accidents; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for generating seating charts for vehicles; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for geographic mapping and map maintenance; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for tracking student ridership; and software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for fleet information management in the nature of tracking vehicle maintenance, repairs, and efficiency; all of the foregoing for use by schools, school bus fleets, and other routed fleets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |