Drawing for VESSEL PANTRY

USPTO serial 99903585

VESSEL PANTRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUIZ SANTIAGO, REBECCA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 130

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VESSEL PANTRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rachel Jacques

Rachel Jacques MASCHOFF BRENNAN1389 Center DriveSuite 300Park City, UT 84098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Spices; Sauces; Seasoning; Condiments, namely, Rosemary Crunch being spice blends, Ras el Hanout being spice blends, Yemanite Hawaiig being spice blends, Miso Cashew being sauce mixes; preserved lemons, namely, flavorings of lemons for food or beverageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 24, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance