Drawing for MEI SMART LADDER

USPTO serial 99906210

MEI SMART LADDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEI SMART LADDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Courtney Thompson

Courtney Thompson Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.60 South Sixth StreetSuite 1500Minneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal ladders; Metal ladders for use in elevator pits; Metal ladders for use in elevator pits with electronic device to shut off elevator power when ladder is being usedACTIVE—
007Passenger elevator operating apparatus being parts of machines; Elevators and parts of elevatorsACTIVE—
009Electronic controller to manage the power, movement and functions of an elevator; Computer hardwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 25, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance