USPTO serial 99906888
COCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLUECK, CHRISTOPHER N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Menlo Park, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adina N. Brand
Adina N. Brand Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner P.A.PO Box 2938Minneapolis, MN 55402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software using artificial intelligence for autonomous and supervised task completion; Downloadable computer software for use in processing and generating natural language queries; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for the production of text and images; Downloadable computer application software for mobile devices using artificial intelligence for simulating real time conversations, question-answering systems, searching and retrieving information, and providing reference materials and other resources available on computer networks. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for autonomous and supervised task completion; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for processing, generating, understanding and analyzing natural language using artificial intelligence; Providing online non-downloadable virtual assistant software that uses artificial intelligence for simulating conversations; Platform as a Service (PaaS) services featuring software featuring a virtual assistant that uses artificial intelligence and natural language understanding to converse with users, execute user instructions, execute queries, and index data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in providing a virtual assistant that uses artificial intelligence to enhance access to information and services on a technology platform and website; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for mobile devices using artificial intelligence for simulating real-time conversations, question-answering systems, searching and retrieving information, and providing reference materials and other resources available on computer networks. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |