USPTO serial 99911572
COVER CONCEPTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with COVER CONCEPTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Haines City, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aisling E. Altidore
Aisling E. Altidore Pandiscio & Pandiscio83 Walnut StreetSuite 150Wellesley, MA 02481Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | protective products for horizontal and vertical surfaces, such as floors, walls, counter tops and furniture, in the form of rolls and sheets, namely, paper, breathable foam and plastic materials in rolls or sheets, used during the construction process to prevent damage, such as from foot traffic, dirt, light debris, paint, moisture, and other in-construction related hazards, to in-process or installed finished flooring, wall, counter tops or furniture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |